5.1.1.
Formål
Kontraktens hovedformål: Varer
Primær klassifikation (cpv): 42122200 Fortrængningspumper med stempel eller membran til væsker
Supplerende klassifikation (cpv): 42122100 Væskepumper, 42122130 Vandpumper, 42122300 Trykpumper til væsker, 45232100 Arbejder og følgearbejder i forbindelse med vandrørledninger, 45332000 Blikkenslager- og rørlægningsarbejde
5.1.2.
Udførelsessted
Postadresse: Merløsevej 1C
By: Nyrup
Postnummer: 4296
Landsdel (NUTS): Vest- og Sydsjælland (DK022)
Land: Danmark
5.1.4.
Fornyelse
Højeste antal fornyelser: 0
5.1.5.
Værdi
Anslået værdi eksklusiv moms: 15 000 000,00 DKK
5.1.6.
Generelle oplysninger
Indkøbsprojekt, der ikke finansieres med EU-midler
Udbuddet er omfattet af aftalen om offentlige udbud (GPA): ja
Yderligere oplysninger: Please be advised that the contracting authority has decided to cancel the present tender procedure. This decision has been made because budget approval for the high-pressure pump unit for brine injection has not been obtained.
5.1.10.
Tildelingskriterier
Kriterium:
Type: Pris
Navn: Price
Beskrivelse: Prices must be stated in the attached Price List and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated DKK. Prices must be stated in the attached Price List and the defined price elements must be completed herein. Prices must be stated exclusive of VAT but inclusive of all other expenses associated with the purchase. Prices must be stated in DKK
Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)
Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 25,00
Kriterium:
Type: Kvalitet
Navn: Technical solution
Beskrivelse: The tenderer must as part of the sub-criterion “Technical solution” include the following: • A detailed and specific technical description with dimensions, maximum working pressures, etc. of all parts, • drawings and associated part lists as well as assembly drawings (draft), • list of recommended spare parts, and service conditions regarding installation on site in Denmark. When evaluating “Technical solution”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate whether the tenderer documents a technically high-quality solution, i.e. to which extent the proposed design and materials are suitable taking into consideration the intended purpose. Further, the following be evaluated positive: • The overall energy consumption is as low as possible. • The robustness of pump system operational capability i.e. capability to perform load changes and there are long maintenance intervals between overhauls. • That the calculation and simulation method for overall system design focuses on mitigating operational risks and system failures i.e. pump trips. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)
Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 25,00
Kriterium:
Type: Kvalitet
Navn: Delivery time
Beskrivelse: As part of the evaluation the tenderer must state the maxi-mum guaranteed delivery time from contract commencement date until final delivery as of-build documentation and project close-out The evaluation of “Delivery time” will be based on the stated delivery time as offered by the tenderer: • A maximum delivery time of up to 14 months will result in a score of 10, whereas a maximum delivery time of 24 months or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given based on linear interpolation. • Any tender that states a delivery time longer than 24 months will be considered non-compliant and excluded cf. section 3.7.1
Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)
Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 25,00
Kriterium:
Type: Kvalitet
Navn: Project- and quality plan and Time schedule
Beskrivelse: As the project is of importance to Gas Storage Denmark as it is a critical component, the tenderer must provide assurance to production of high quality taking into consideration the criticality of the project. The tenderer may as part of the description(s) include how obtained standards are used to ensure quality at all stages. The tender should include: • Project plan • Quality plan • Time Schedule The tenderer should include a project plan and a detailed time and activity schedule with dates, and outline how the work will be structured from the contract commencement date until final delivery as of-build documentation and project close-out. The overall project plan and time schedule with dates shall include: A. Manufacturing process and delivery on site B. Installation process C. Commissioning procedures D. Final documentation handed over The tender must also fill out the template for a generic time in the column regarding delivery, installation, commissioning and final documentation handed over cf. Appendix 4: Time Schedule (doc. no. 25/07216-20) The tender version of the Quality plan shall include description concerning: A. The quality control system B. How the tenderer fulfills the quality requirements outlined by Energinet C. Inspection plan D. Fabrication plan When evaluating “Project- and quality plan and time Schedule”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate to which degree the tender provides assurance as to the quality of production and which the tender demonstrates a well-planned, realistic and robust time schedule, that secure delivery within the timeline. Further, the following will be evaluated positive: • The project plan will be evaluated on its robustness and activities for the achieving the optimal design is within the time schedule. • The quality plan will be evaluated on how the tenderer fulfill the quality requirements outlined by Energinet including total project quality, design, fabrication, inspection, and test as well as pre-commissioning and commissioning. • The time schedule will be evaluated on its robustness and that schedule reflects a realistic, but frontloaded schedule for the critical activities, which allows sufficient time for potential schedule contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)
Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 15,00
Kriterium:
Type: Kvalitet
Navn: Contract Terms
Beskrivelse: For the evaluation of the sub-criteria the below should be enclosed: If the tenderer includes a list of proposed deviations to the attached contractual terms: • Contract Agreement for Purchase (doc. no. 25/07216-11), • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase (doc. no. 25/07216-12), the tenderer must use the Clarification List (doc. no. 25/07216-6). The proposed deviations to the contractual terms must be stated in the spreadsheet marked “Legal clarification” and should be explicit and with explanation as to why they are made. The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. The tenderer may, however, suggest explicit and well-explained deviations to the contractual terms which the Contracting Authority has identified as competitive criteria’s below: • Contract Agreement for Purchase (doc. no. 25/07216-11): o Section 5, sub-clause 12.1 (Late-delivery or non-delivery) o Section 5, sub-clause 13.1 and 13.4 (Defects and remedies) o Section 5, sub-clause 14.2 (Limitation of liability) o Section 5, sub-clause 16.1 (Insurance) o Section 5, sub-clause 18.1 + 18.3 (Performance guarantee) • Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Purchase (doc. no. 25/07216-12): o Clause 2 (Requirements), except for sub-clause 2.3 o Sub-clause 4.6 (Advance payment guarantee – except for what is stated as mandatory parts of the Tender Documents, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 above) o Clause 9 (Time of Delivery) o Clause 11 (Intellectual property rights) o Clause 12 (Late-delivery or non-delivery) o Clause 13 (Defects and remedies) o Clause 14 (Limitation of liability) o Clause 15 (Product liability) o Clause 16 (Insurance) o Clause 17 (Indemnification) o Clause 18 (Performance guarantee – except for what is stated as mandatory parts of the Tender Documents, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 above) o Sub-Clause 20.3 (HSE requirements) o Clause 25 (Termination) These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion "Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criteria. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1.
Kategori for tildelingskriteriet vægt: Vægtning (procentdel, præcis)
Tildelingskriterium talværdi: 10,00
5.1.15.
Teknikker
Rammeaftale:
Ingen rammeaftale
Oplysninger om det dynamiske indkøbssystem:
Intet dynamisk indkøbssystem
Elektronisk auktion: nej
5.1.16.
Yderligere oplysninger, mægling og gennemgang
Organisation med ansvar for klager: Klagenævnet for Udbud
Oplysninger om klagefrister: Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision. Other complaints must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within: 1. 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication date); 2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed the tenderers in question, that the contracting author-ity has entered a contract based on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the rele-vant reasons for the decision; 3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates/tenderers involved that the contract-ing authority has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included a short account of the relevant rea-sons for the decision.
Organisation, der leverer supplerende oplysninger om udbudsproceduren: Gas Storage Denmark A/S
Organisation, der sikrer adgang til udbudsdokumenterne offline: Gas Storage Denmark A/S
Organisation, der leverer yderligere oplysninger om klageprocedurerne: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen
TED eSender: Mercell Holding ASA